Recruiting older adults for clinical trials

Control Clin Trials. 1997 Feb;18(1):14-26. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(96)00132-8.

Abstract

More than 400 community-dwelling older adults were recruited into a clinical trial which compared the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment through geriatric assessment with that provided through usual community physician care. Six recruitment methods were utilized: referrals, solicitations, presentations, media, mailings, and fliers. Each method is described and its results reported in terms of numbers recruited, yield, and cost per participant. The most efficient method was referrals; the method producing the largest number was presentations; the least effective method was fliers. Problems and solutions are discussed, and guidelines for recruiting older adults are suggested. These guidelines include: monitoring with accompanying adaptation, targeting the groups most likely to benefit, providing incentives, and reducing uncertainty among potential participants.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Advertising
  • Aged*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic / methods*
  • Correspondence as Topic
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Female
  • Geriatric Assessment*
  • Health Services Accessibility
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mass Media
  • Motivation
  • Patient Selection*
  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Random Allocation
  • Referral and Consultation