Efficacy and tolerability of perampanel in pediatric patients with Dravet syndrome

Purpose: In the present study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of perampanel in patients with Dravet syndrome.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data regarding seizure frequency and adverse effects in 10 patients (four boys, six girls) with Dravet syndrome following treatment with perampanel. Perampanel treatment was considered effective when seizure frequency had been reduced by more than 50%.

Results: The mean age of patients at perampanel introduction was 11.5 ± 2.2 years. Seizure types were as follows: generalized tonic-clonic seizure (n = 8), unilateral clonic seizure (n = 6), myoclonic seizure (n = 3), atypical absence seizure (n = 3), and focal impaired awareness seizure (n = 1). The average number of concomitant anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) was 3 ± 0.9. The mean duration of perampanel use was 11.1 ± 3.8 months. Seizure frequency was reduced by more than 50% in five patients (50%). The efficacy of perampanel for each seizure type was as follows: generalized tonic-clonic seizure: 50% (4/8), unilateral clonic seizure: 50% (3/6), myoclonic seizure: 33% (1/3), atypical absence seizure: 33% (1/3), and focal impaired awareness seizure: 100% (1/1). The effects of perampanel in each patient occurred between 3 and 6 months following the initiation of treatment. Seizure reduction was observed beginning at perampanel doses of 0.1 ± 0.07 mg/kg/day. Adverse events were observed in seven of 10 patients. Although somnolence was noted in 50% of patients, most events were mild.

Conclusions: The results of this retrospective observational study indicate that perampanel treatment may be promising in some patients with Dravet syndrome. Additional studies are necessary to verify the actual efficacy of perampanel for Dravet syndrome.